ATOs and EIs
As the official accreditor the APM Group must have a big say in who gets to be appointed as an Examination Institute (EI).
It is an interesting fact that the APM Group has two distinctive roles..
1. As the "official accreditor" - where it gets to lay down rules and guidelines for EIs and manage the examination question bank
and
2. as an Examination Institute - where it works with Accredited Training Organizations (ATOs).
I'm not a gambling man, but I can't see the APMG breaking it's own rules; whereas other EIs may not be so quick to tow the line.
Could this be a good enough reason to back training organizations that have aligned themselves with the APM Group?
It is an interesting fact that the APM Group has two distinctive roles..
1. As the "official accreditor" - where it gets to lay down rules and guidelines for EIs and manage the examination question bank
and
2. as an Examination Institute - where it works with Accredited Training Organizations (ATOs).
I'm not a gambling man, but I can't see the APMG breaking it's own rules; whereas other EIs may not be so quick to tow the line.
Could this be a good enough reason to back training organizations that have aligned themselves with the APM Group?
Labels: APM Group, exams, EXIN, ISEB, ITIL, ITIL certification, ITIL education, ITIL training, ITIL version 3
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home